Peter Bingle gets stuck into another piece defending his lunching

Written by Mr Stakeholder on 5 November 2018 in Diary

It turns out that the Tory lobbyist does care about the APPC-PRCA merger after all.

When certain sections of the public affairs industry were gripped by the APPC-PRCA merger plan getting the green light, one figure was keen to stress his total indifference.

“Nobody cares! More fun watching paint dry,” stated a certain Peter Bingle. “APPC totally hopeless. The empire of Francis Ingham grows ever larger. He is a modern Tiberius without the flaws!”

But a few weeks is clearly a long time in lobbying. So less than a month after the verdict, it turns out that the former Bell Pottinger lobbying chief does care after all.

“In celebration of the merger between the APPC and the PRCA, I thought the timing was propitious for an article in defence of lobbying,” he has now written.

In his piece on the PRCA website, the man once dubbed ‘never knowingly under-lunched’ returns to one of his favourite themes, asking: “Why is it wrong for a public affairs practitioner to take out a politician for lunch? Journalists do it all the time. Bizarre.”

He also makes his familiar plea for lobbyists to be less shy about what they do: “The old swagger has too often been replaced with a heads-down approach to dealing with journalists and commentators. Perhaps there is a fear that a high profile will lead to unwanted media attention? If so, I hope that the newly created Public Affairs Board will set about restoring the industry’s self-confidence.”

Unusually for Bingle, rather than annoying everyone his piece seems to have garnered some support from some senior industry figures. On LinkedIn, Gavin Devine called it a “timely article about our much-misunderstood craft” while Kevin McKeever wrote: “Not always a fan of PB, but well written and rightly argued piece!”

What’s going on? How long until Bingle is losing friends and alienating people again?

Mr Stakeholder gives him until lunchtime…



Share this page